Posts Tagged ‘GMC’

GMC Cocked up.

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

Panel Members:
Dr A Morgan, Chairman (Medical)
Dr Sheila Willatts (Medical)
Mr J Campbell (Lay)
Legal Assessor: Mrs A Black
Secretary to the Panel: Ms J Smith

http://tinyurl.com/5t8k2b4

“Ruling on the appeal, Lord Justice Girvan added:

“The internal inconsistencies in her previous version of events …”

“The finding by the panel that the patient presented as a consistent, reliable and credible witness is one that no tribunal properly directing itself on the evidence could have made in the circumstances.”

The GMC is currently presenting a series of questions on Facebook about how doctors should be regulated. Perhaps a useful exercise would be for them to ask how regulators should be regulated, and how they should work. The GMC has escaped the control of the profession it purports to protect and supervise, and has not demonstrated that it does not need to be controlled and supervised. It lacks the confidence of the profession which when we elected it it possessed.

What Did Dr Julia Cost? FOIA Answer

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/dr_julia?unfold=1

GMC: Cartoon characters. Not very good.

Friday, July 1st, 2011

http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/9748.asp The reason the number feeding back that it is irritating and uninformative, aimed at a less sophisticated population than doctors, and poorly executed in plot, production and presentation is low is that it is a fundamental pain to register to give that feedback. So poor marks for website usability as well. And an expensive luxury for someone to indulge themselves in using Other People’s Money including mine. The GMC became taxation without representation some time ago, and would be a suitable target if we had a Tea Party in this country.

Impervious to debate, convinced you are right, you have traduced

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

The Crown Court
Quayside Newcastle Upon Tyne
21st March 2002

JUDGE WHITBURN: Penelope Mellor, please stand.
“Penelope Mellor, you were convicted by a jury of a wicked conspiracy to abduct [XXXX] in February 1999. A woman of ability, determination and tenacity, you have been a self-appointed advocate for those, amongst others, whose children are taken into care on the basis of what was known as Munchausens Syndrome By Proxy, now known as Fictitious Illness Syndrome.

Your view, expressed to the Jury, was that this was a misdiagnosis, designed to cover up medical negligence. Impervious to debate, convinced you are right, you have traduced, complained about and harried dedicated professional people working in this difficult area. I do not punish you for that, let me make it clear, however tiresome and eccentric your views are, the toleration afforded to you who expressed them, by those who hear them, is part of the price we gladly pay for living in a liberal democracy.”

It is not part of a price that registered medical practitioners gladly pay for self-regulation of the profession, or regulation of the profession, which is what the GMC’s sole source of income for carrying out its statutory duties is. Ms Mellor should receive no expenses nor other funding from the GMC.

Surely an unconvicted parent advocate must exist?

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

I would expect the GMC to have been able to find a “parent advocate” to join its working party who had no criminal convictions. Penny Mellor is an odd choice, and I think a poor one.